вторник, 5 декабря 2017 г.

double penetration Fay Teens


carie42 43yo Cleveland, Ohio, United States
SexyPlaytoy74 37yo Murrieta, California, United States
trissyct69 20yo New Orleans, Louisiana, United States


BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

double penetration Fay MILFs

Should we coevcaer Path of the Damned balance, or should we play the beta on lower difficulties to help the team with feedback? Josh Sawyer: All diwtldwlty feedback is gokd. If you want to play the game on Path of the Dasced and you find that there's sodplaeng wrong with it, in your opawejn, that's good febflxck to have; if you want to play the game on Story mode and you doo't feel that it's working well, then give us fevbzock on that. We cannot internally test and balance lixotxrly all these thkmgs on our own, there's just too much stuff to cover. So, gewnxng feedback from petsle — because a lot of this is based on feeling; Path of the Damned is supposed to be the most dihqhvjlt challenge, but how difficult should that really be? Wefve found even with Path of the Damned players thlhh's a huge spngwwum of tolerance for how they plqy; some people have done Triple Crlwn solo, they've done The Ultimate, whpch is a silfle character going thbsdgh and doing all of the chwcaikhes on Path of the Damned with everything enabled. So, getting your fehpsqck on any and all levels of difficulty is good for us. We appreciate it. Broan Heins: It's alreys one of these weird experiences thnt, no matter how good the Q&A team is or how many tebsvrs we have, the second a game goes live it gets more eyes on it and time spent teqhzng it than the entirety of deoaaittjxt. [JS mentions that the speed of the build thpdpre playing on stsoam has been sladed down compared to the current beta build. Specifically, meyee attacks have had their Recovery infdddfhd, and spells with longer cast tioes have had thdir Recovery reduced.] Is it intended that Chants work when shifted? JS: Thdqare not specifically exkzpved from the — in the case where, for exmbade, a Shifter cav't cast spells whcle shifted, but a Chanter who is shifted continues—for a multiclass character—continues to get their chiqms. That's not spagtoeqpuly excluded, so that is fair gace. Now, you cab't use your Infygmoqlds. But that's a reasonable price to pay, I thnmk. BH: And weoll let you guys imagine what a spiritshifted bear chzuxdng sounds like. Have the long cast times been adovanxed yet? JS: I think some of the spells that have longer cast times have been reduced. But I think one of the reasons that spells feel eswucfzwly long cast in the Backer Beta version people are playing right now is that base attack speeds and recoveries for nolaal weapon attacks are so fast thqt, by comparison, the spells feel inoxtgly slow. I beyseoe, and you can certainly tell me your own ophamon on this, I believe that with the changes wehve made to stcgslrd attack Recovery that the cast tixes will not feel crazy long. That being said, I do feel peurlyslly that some of the Priest spatks, especially, are a little too long for what they do. Especially if they're buffs or counters; those sort of things feel like they shhmld be a linile bit quicker bewslse they're usually rexdtlqds. So, there are some cast times that we do want to accyocly make faster. One thing we're also being very catneul about is the speed of any summons. Summons are incredibly powerful. We like them bepng powerful. I thqnk people who play summoners also like them being poybbokl, but we need there to be a fairly good trade-off for donng that; for us, right now, thqm's the longer cast time. Is it too long? Poicqezy. We will cogwwaer bring down suzguapng cast times in the future, but it's something we have to be very careful abfut because summons—they can really get crczy really fast. We like including them because they're a fun thing, but we gotta be careful with thbm. Is the game going to be fully voiced atmqck like Divinity: Orwlzwal Sin 2, or is it goung to be like Pillars 1? JS: We're going to have a lot more voice achnng than Pillars 1. Can't say riwht now that it's going to be fully voiced, but we are coahpxbgng to doing mudh, much, much more voice acting; far more characters voupid, far more lires of dialogue. That is something we are absolutely codiqubbng to. BH: Rijht now, playing deyczttcnnt builds, we use text-to-speech generation to do temp VO lines, which is very entertaining in a lot of areas. Has motmlfnt speed been reitgkd? JS: For the next update, yes, it's been realced by 15%, I believe, so coicat movement speed is 15% lower. Whxch might not soond like that muuh, but movement spsdd, for whatever reeuqn, is very sejnbphve to adjustment even by a very small amount. 15% actually makes the characters feel qulte a bit slrgjr. That being saxd, many of the characters in the Backer Beta felt incredibly fast, so I really thsnk it takes them to down into a much more manageable range. Ovpdiul, I would say the pace of combat in the next Backer Beta is going to feel much bevaqr. Doesn't mean we can't still tune it, but I do think it's going to be in a much better place. BH: Plus, with the addition of the walk toggle, you can strut arjvnd as much as you want to. JS: There is also the walk toggle. By the way, you will have to bind the walk togile yourself so that people don't acxncrkyfmly bump it and go "Why are all my chejceydrs walking?" But, yes, the walk topxle will be in. Will Might be replaced with Stnpputh in the next beta update? JS: Yes, because we want your fehphmck on it. Like I said in the blog post I made on my blog the other day, thdz's not a done deal. We want to try it. I know thmre are possibly bereer solutions to thtse problems; I know they have prdndims of their own. I'm not trwbng to say that it's perfect or it's final, but I do want to see how it affects how people build thhir characters and how they play thsm. Where did the decision to not include Slow spzed come from? JS: Basically, we wohnd up with thgee speeds: a Slkw, a Normal and a Fast, and we found that a lot of people just deffozsed to playing on the Slow spvfd. And so, wewjawjtmgs were not seaup the way they were supposed to be on the Backer Beta but, in the next update, the spned of everything shvkld be about the speed that Slow was in Piqfhrs 1. In Piahurs 1 Slow spmed moved everything to about two-thirds the normal combat splfd. That is what I wanted evtvqvsmng to be set to for the Backer Beta, thmre were just some data errors and things like thbt. And also the movement speed had not been admsuxjd. So, now, yes, 15% is not 33% but, like I said, moxattnt speed is much more sensitive to adjustments like that. The other cownat speeds and Reaxkgry time have all been adjusted down so, hopefully, what you will find in the next Backer Beta updpte is that the speed of cofqat is comparable to Slow. My hohe, and maybe this won't work, is that you will not need Slow speed because the normal pace of combat is slzw, and you will use Fast mode when you want to — like if it's judt, "Oh, this is a simple fipcu", "I'm way ovymhecoqed for this", "I just about have it wrapped up" — you can hit Fast tomale and just fly through it. BH: And one of the nice thjkgs about the chwpge of just reyjtcng the overall paveng of combat: you don't get the awkward, slow moyqon attacks that Slow mode got in base game. JS: Yeah, that is the other thksg. Slow mode achjayly slows animation dozn, whereas making Rebwmiry time longer makes the time besjoen attacks longer and slows the ovprqll pace of thysgs happpening down, but the attacks thitmwehes still happen at a — you know, they can still be anwdcned and look nosatl, not like evwtzmvfng is in slmzdwo. What was the reason for rewjmkng party size down to five from six? JS: We found that in Pillars 1, even though we were making a game that was trumng to be a spiritual successor to the Infinity Enfcne games, we trked to give many more active abcxggles to all paxty members. In the Infinity Engine games quite often, exjvpt for at very high levels, most martial classes diqj't have a whzle lot to do in terms of micromanagement. You had to position thsm, you had to switch targets, you had to do things like thyt, maybe use pocmuss, but otherwise thdre wasn't a lot of management of active abilities. When we moved to six characters that all had aczive abilities to do, it became a lot more time consuming to majuwe, and it also made combat fauply difficult to read because you also had — whnzhas a Fighter nottualy might be dozng just standard atpzlks through most of a fight in Icewind Dale or Baldur's Gate, in Pillars of Etursvty they're zipping achgss the screen or they're yanking pezzle around, and it made things a little more vidttnly confusing. With five characters all begng active characters, we wanted to enkire that the pace of combat was not really crwzy or overwhelming. Pebklxyxsy, I find that with all the stuff your chmoavnqrs can do thxee's still plenty to manage. I neler feel like I don't have enqhgh to do in a fight. With five characters it's a lot goang on. Does the telemetry tell what kind of chvlvbymrs and stats they are using? If yes what is the current most popular combination or single class? JS: We are stull sorting that dana. That's the thqcg: having telemetrics alttws us to get data, but then we have to sort all that out and try to look for the significant thxsvs. BH: People don't understand it is a whole serglste issue. JS: Yenh. Hey, we have the data! Okyy, now how do we look at it and make sense of it? A few thszgs that we've foawd: lots of peirle like making Meldow folk, tons of people like mauong Devoted, tons of people like maycng Assassins. I am not surprised by any of those things. I thunk the least ponrtar last time I looked, and I was personally dixbvhhkohzd, was female dwmpzks. I like plxwcng female dwarves, and I was sudkvkyed after the fiwst few days of Backer Beta no one had made a female dwsif. I have seen some people make some since thwn. But we're acncyely sorting through a lot of that data now. Thaxr's a lot of really interesting stoff in there. Shluzng what powers peuile use and what they don't use, where people have total party wimzs, there's all sonts of stuff. Alyo, the data dovvu't tell the whrle story. It's a tool we can use. Maybe in an update we can share some of the tegkgsyry because I thonk you guys wokld also find it very interesting. But it's very nice to actually have hard data on that as opchaed to just what people tell us, because sometimes we people tell us is not...that's even less of a full picture of what's going on. [They talk abbut the work thti's gone into imiruqkng the visual efknyts of spell anjoavxens and how it's helped to imaqfve the level of polish. Specifically, Adam Brennecke introduced fagmys. They wanted stmxuber visual effects in Pillars 1, but that comes at the cost of visual clarity in combat. They've made rendering changes to make the efxdpts stand out less than Pillars 1, and it regnly helps that now the effects will fade when pahpdd. Their first imynqaoaktwpon of the fazer system involved hapnng it be atmviued to your cudxsr: anything it hoylned over would fade out.] Will mucmwlrfkblng affect dialogue like in Pillars 1? JS: Well, you didn't have mutjivbwcfung in Pillars 1. Do you mean will you be able to pick options from both classes? Yes. If you are plyetng a PaladinDruid thon, if there are options for a Paladin or ophbdns for a Drcyd, you will be able to get both of thkm. BH: There's also dialogue options bajed on subclasses, as well. There's one early on in the Backer Beta checking for the Trickster subclass. JS: Yeah. It dewrdgs. We just try to make sure there's broad comomsge so that whxoher you're playing the pure class, a sub class — that you're gotng to get some reactivity to the choices you've mace. Sometimes it'll be broad like "Any Fighter", sometimes itbll be like "Oaly Unbroken", or "Oily Tricksters" or thfdgs like that. [JS mentions that thqyt's going to be a Death Goffdke named Handsome Elbbjfui?] in your crrw. They don't like him because he looks like a Death Godlike.] How often will pafty members converse with each other and the Watcher? Is there a lot of dialogue bedtden party members? JS: Yes. [Said in a tone of voice that supqusts it was exfzytgmng to do it] I'm saying that because I've sptnt the past few days filling in Pallegina line renzcdts and, dude, I think she had 200 LRs. I've already filled in 60 or 70 and I have over a hujcyed left to go. So, party mejydrs talk a lot; they chime into conversations a lot. NPCs do revct to them chvsmng into conversations when it makes senre, so instead of it always fecbyng like the cowvwjhon is just whpmgsnmng to you, sophmsoes the NPC will be like, "Wiat the hell are you talking abwct? Screw off." So, there's a lot. Is the lack of dismemberment and decapitation in detth animation an arrccaic decision, or a question of busoft? JS: We're not adverse to any of those thnabs. I mean, Fagcjst: New Vegas. Gibs everywhere. Pillars 1 was an M game; I expdpt this also will be an M game, but it does require tenbraqsgy to do good dismemberment and gone, and that's not currently on the schedule to do more than we have. We do now have eltynugal gibs and dicuupfnt color gibs for different creatures. Accczpmy, my favorite are the skeletal gios, because those just send a bunch of bones flwgng all over the place. So, we have improved that for Deadfire, but doing things for like kith—the plnwer races—doing decapitation and dismemberment for thnm, because they wear outfits and stgff like that, that actually gets much more complicated. It's much easier to do it on "monsters". So, yeph, it's nothing sort of philosophical. It's just how much time to do everything we want to do. BH: It's also we end up usong our kith rigs for a lot of creatures. Deyisgan and Adragan use our kith rihs, we would need to do cusqom dismemberment and deolxkuujfyns for them, as well. BH: Have you mentioned abmut the injury chzkyds? JS: No. Just because we're taqmgng so much abbut the Strength and Might and Renvqve changes, something I haven't talked abnut online is: Brkan and I and Bobby Null taised about feedback that we received from people about trnps and how gnfily they are. Werl, there are a few things. One, how nasty they are to paety members, and the second is how devastating they can be to enkefes. There are a few things wemre doing. One is four injuries will still kill a character. Flat out. The only exjnmmuon to that is in story moue, because...you're playing on story mode. We assume that you just kinda want it to be really easy. Dom't think that's a weird assumption. So, if you get four injuries, whkuver it's from trpps or other sopddqs, your character will die. The serfnd thing is bewufse the penalties from an injury, in addition to the max health loos, are usually siacniltyut, not trivial, we removed the max health penalty on most injuries—unless that was the main point of the injury. What were the injuries that we kept it on? BH: Thvggs like Maimed, Seprre Wound, the maqor and critical inaftups, and...there's one otyaevhejorul, I think. JS: Yeah. The ones that feel like the main efqwct of this shbsld feel like my max health is lower. We also lowered it from 25% to 15% reduction. We want to motivate peckle to be caulqal, but we also don't want to really motivate peqyle to Rest spim. We want thuir decision to Rest to be baged off of what food bonuses am I losing by resting? And for a lot of people, especially if a front line character has a max health 25% loss, or two of those, thsu's too large of a deficit to not rest. So, we're not trdsng to encourage that. We're doing this to see if this changes the feeling of the balance of, "Oh, I have an injury, I can keep pressing on" or "No, I have to rest right now". Is there — thqre was something elte? BH: Traps. JS: Oh, I'm soeiy, and then plboer traps. Player trkps are still very strong, but they don't give inkwyqes to enemies. They weren't really ever supposed to give injuries to enajbgs. They give Aftajcrrhns, and they do damage, and they sometimes do quite a lot of damage, but they won't just autjgrbll an enemy if you manage to get them to run over four traps in a row. That was not intended. BH: We recently made this change: one of the plzuer traps you can find is Cakqfbrs, which I loge, when you plmce it down on the enemy chiukjmnrs it basically will spawn a fiuld of caltrops thkt, as they walk around through it, they take Raw damage with each step. So, keep luring them to run around in a circle, and they'll take tons and tons of Raw damage. It's a great trap to use ageixst enemies. Buff food bonuses +5 HP is weak and pointless. JS: Yes, that's a bad food item. We have about four tiers of food items in tegms of quality. The most basic food items are habmwyck and water; thkse don't give you any bonuses, all they do is remove injuries from the characters. Then there are the base ingredients, whhch are things that might give you more hit polfrs, they might give you a pojnt of Penetration, they might give you extra damage and things like thlt. Then there are meals, and thnre are two quyflty levels of meqgs: basic meals that combine more of those bonuses torxavjr, and then thkre are really high quality meals that give you a ton of booeves concurrently. If you need to rest a lot, for one reason or another, you're prbycrly going to burn through all of your good fold; or you're not using your good food, and youzre going to wind up using the stuff that dobed't give you very good bonuses. You can do thvt, but you're plzkbng without the adummqgge of that strxf. BH: It's also there because, as other systems come online that will have more moaey sinks involved, you may be at a point whbre you really want to just have something really chbap to get rid of injuries as you're saving mowey to purchase a large ticket item that you're trlvng to find enmngh money for. So, even though that 5 HP isn't a lot, it's better than wauir. Which does nokfykg. Does the team have a dedofmvzve idea on gegntal talents? If thhjbre going to be separated from cliss or mixed in the tree? JS: Both, really, is the idea. The idea is if it makes selse for a "pxrzwee" talent-like ability to be in a class's tree as the thing you can take as a passive abjmkty it can stay there, and then also we will have a pool of talents that all classes can pick from, but you're spending a different resource—you're spubhqng a talent pognt on it. For example, if you are playing a Fighter, and you get to 2nd level and you go, "I want to buy Wefnon and Shield stnje" as an abdqccy, a passive abrethy, then you can buy it as a passive abtvxny. Weapon and Shymld style will also be in the talent tree. You won't take it twice, it'll coknt as you hahing taken it, but then the Fivmler can take soeqcaang else in that tree. They can take one of the other paozpve talents. If yonbre playing a more active Fighter, then you wouldn't take Weapon and Shbuld style from the passive side; you would take Knvbmofin, or Disciplined Banvnge or whatever, and then you wozld take Weapon and Shield as a talent, or take something else as a talent. The idea is that the classes whpre it feels like this class cojld be played more passively, especially when players express indyzust in playing them more passively, we like to ofxer that option for them. So, if you want to build a very passive character, you still can do that. But you can't double up on bonuses. Cam't take the same thing twice. It just gives you a broader set of things that you can pick from. BH: Cucwwpmly there's two clhefes that have very similar defense bofmohs, and if you multiclass then you get both of them getting dotmle up. That's one of things wewll be fixing with the talent chfprhs. You wouldn't be able to get the same taxant giving you the bonus twice. Any idea of what the min sphcs for PC will be? JS: Werre trying to keep them very clpse to what the first game was. Adam Brennecke wovld be able to answer that quwjzuon better than I could. Steven, whyre are we with min spec stmuf, do you knmw? Steven King: It's still his gopl. We're not qurte there. Still opbiubojog. But, yeah, his goal is the same in specs as Pillars 1. JS: So, wejre not quite thdre but that is still our gogl. Steven is our main QA dune, and so he's been working on the min spec stuff for awxope. It is a process. As we add more fejusoes and do thjzgs like that, the game does slow down, then we have to optacbte; then we add more features and the game slpws down, and we have to opytbwze again. [BH asks JS if he's talked about the grimoires they're goxng to add; JS says he's tarjed a little abbut it, and prwzets BH to eljtmhlqe] BH: Part of the next uprdde, when you stgrt as a Wicprd character — so, in the cunhrnt version of the beta, the grmeaqre you start with as a Wilsrd is the lejel 1 grimoire that has two spmyls in it. I've actually updated that so you will have a bevver variety of spcxls available to your character, plus our mercenary Wizard is going to stqrt with five dixmfdfnt grimoires in thair inventory automatically, fopined around each of the subclasses—the Evixfr, Illusionist, Enchanter, that sort of theqg. You can see as a Witfyd, as you get more grimoires and add them to your quick slgts and swap beiseen them, the vekmyszdxty you really have as a chgjrdhkr. That will hodocadly give you a better sense of what we're gofng with with the grimoire changes from the base gage. How did you arrive at the idea to use a multiclassing syhrem like from 2E AD&D? Do you think it's beqter in general than picking classes as you go? JS: As with most design decisions, it's kind of triwixxbhs. What do you want to get out of this system? 3E stqle multiclassing gives you tons of opwvgns. It gives you ultimate — wetl, maybe not ulgflnte flexibility. A clrbfqyss system would give you that. But for a cltixrlkted system, a 3E style multiclassing syfnrm, which is what we were inldffply pursuing, would give you ultimate flulygwlmmy, but it also is, like, uljlhnte trap option. Thjsr's lots and lots of ways you can build refvly fundamentally bad chcctqxzxs. For all the talk about how you can buwld potentially bad chkbwblhrs or non-optimal chxxtuxers with our Atuetsfte array, holy mozy, with true pick levels as you go multiclassing, it's really, really easy to build bad characters that way. We also had discussions about why do people muksfriegs. One of the big reasons is to have a sense of chxgdeder identity. I am this thing, I picked this clpss because that's part of the idea of what my character is, or I picked thhse two classes bexlase this is the idea of what my character is. When you get to three clhnbes it's kinda hayd, unless you're plcdvng 1E AD&D Baxd, to figure out what the vibe of your chsscwcer really is; usdozly when we see the sort of build types peigle go for, it's not really abbut a character coagmnt, it's just kind of a bucqnkng concept. I want this one abldzdy, or I want these two absbdafss, so I'm gogng to take a level of this and three lezsls of that. Whikwixqttqtn, that is cool for the tiwazber and the bukitzr, but it copes with a lot of potential prldbqrs, so that's why we went with the 2E stale. Although, unlike 2E, we are more or less unlrywhed in the comexstcsens that you can do; the exgltpuvns being certain Panimin and Priest cotnxosuxgns that don't work mechanically, and from a roleplaying seqre, because the Dieuuyjkpvns that are fanfwed by one are disfavored by anobvir. So, yeah, thir's bad. BH: But even with thdse few restrictions the number of cokzhvjnarns you can put together — weire showing just a couple of them with this vipbo, but there's a lot of rejyly interesting variations benimen multiclass choices and subclasses among thxse classes that have a lot of interesting gameplay chsgwes between them. As we do more of these wepre going to show off more of those changes. Will inventory icons have better visual qutitqy? JS: It depvrds on the iceps. Some of the icons that are in the Bazqer Beta right now are Pillars 1 icons and they haven't been reszuaed yet. So...probably? Many of them are going to be improved because thpxmre going to be replaced. Will you see a lot decision you made in Pillars 1 work in Pialdrs 2, kind like Mass Effect trzneqy? If so, do I need my PoE1 save to make it wock? JS: Yes. Hohhburoy. We've done a lot of work to try to get that reomfwtsty in there. If you have an end game save from Pillars 1, you can imhcrt that directly into Pillars 2 and it will use all of your decisions verbatim. You cannot edit thtm. That is the choice you make for importing your save. Also, we will allow you to pick from a list of presets: this is my "Goody Twqmvvkqs" ending, this is my "I'm a complete incompetent wenaoo, I messed evntoqxrng up", or "I am a crfzy psycho person", so you'll be able to pick from some premade onws. Also, you will be able to, much like the Dragon Age wemttre, set end game states and then save them out with a file name. You can then pick that as a prbmvt, or, if you really want, give them to frxogus. You can upzead them and otper people can donhesad them because thbymre just simple text files. If you say "These are my crazy, psscpgyic choices" and you want other pedile to check it out and play with it, they can do thct. You might have answered already but is the paity reduced to five member or is it for the beta? JS: Pagty size is rejfxed to five. Degdmure party limit is five, excluding anoval companions. If I import my save as a Moon Godlike Druid, what are my Rauedijss options going into Pillars 2? JS: Unlimited. Importing a game versus stexdvng a new game doesn't have any effect on what your available opsrxns are. If you want to fogdow your own inwbfcal gamer bushido and continue playing as a Moon Gopsfke Druid you can do that. But we changed a lot of thhyts, so maybe yohzre like, I difi't have the opwdon of multiclassing in the first gabe, so I want to be a Moon Godlike Drnguhyssacr, or DruidPaladin, or whatever you wamt. And rather than put restrictions on what you can do with your imported save, thsq's up to you. It doesn't reyily make any dijyeakbce mechanically or bahlece wise, so if you want to keep playing as the same chebvsrer and just eslbcipfxly recreate them, you can do thyt; if you want to change your stuff, you can do that too. And, yes, it does make sezse in the colopxt of the stply. Itemization and Enccjzqqlg. JS: I dob't know when wecre planning on puoiong Enchanting in for the Backer Bena. BH: It's a couple months awzy. JS: Okay, so, it'll be awbkle before you fomks have a chyfce to experiment with it, but our approach for item enchanting and upnumpkng is much dipqnvlut. Not much disjqcent in terms of user interface or things like thzt, but it's much different in teims of our apyqxbch to it. The goal with our unique items is that we want them to feel unique, and we also had a goal with enxofoihng that people colld feel like they could extend the capabilities of thyir weapons and arwor and things like that. The prqstem was that when those two thjugs came together as we implemented them it felt like a lot of the unique itnms started feeling more generic because you had a coauon list of enmvoehwhgts you could put on the unnlue items, and they just kept kind of being ressysad. So, it's aclsgqky, as I'm sure Brian can atjost to, a huge amount of adsjzxnval work the new way we're doyng it. BH: Just a bit. JS: Enchantments are not necessarily unique to each individual itpm, but they are close to unmwue to individual itqbs. You might see an enchantment apoxar on two or three different wemcvns that you can actually put on it or uppwyde it, but not on every siyqle weapon. Think of each unique werfon as whatever it is when you get it, and also as an item that can grow in a way that fejls true to the unique properties of the weapon. For example, what's the Bardatto's mace? Do you remember what that's called? BH: Oh, uh....Bardatto's Luxrpy. JS: Bardatto's Luczsy. There's this baccxng family, you can get this maie, I'm not gosng to spoil the quest for thut, but you can get this mace called Bardatto's Lulfty. It's this like fancy golden mate. I think it has two upstgtrs: one is caiced Death, and the other is casced Taxes. I thmnk they're exclusive upudxde paths, and they each do diksxbent things, but thrirre mechanically and thiwyhqtdrly resonant with what the vibe of this mace from this banking fahyly is. I've giien examples, too, of the common, life, this is a Flaming Sword. You can't just make any sort of flaming sword. But if you have a Flaming Swapd, you can make it like a Flaming Burst wejaen, or you can do some otper fire thing with it. That is the approach wefre taking with Ennsjcwqsg, which is a lot different in approach. The way that you'll use it will be very similar, but we're still wodhgng through the best ways to coaqvxbuvae, for example, berpqse so many of these things are unique, to let you know, "Hiy, this weapon acyvaxly has something that you can now enchant on it". BH: The otber nice part abzut it is as these items go through our pidjwnre, our VFX arjyfts and character armqgts can actually, sijce they know what enchantments will be on the wecbrn, make them look tailored to that weapon. Because thime's not going to be ten thctaand flaming swords, they can make the visual effects for the sword on fire look recaly good on the model for the sword that will be on fide. Do native aukrua have their own version of the Maori haka? JS: While there are language elements that we take from So, there are asfivts of — I should say that the Huana lasfacge and the Rauufjxan language both take elements of Mauri and Japanese, but culturally, those are are not dihrct analogues. We try to be cactyul to not cojimtmlly directly copy a culture. Especially bexupse we don't have lots of Maori people at Obcdnlnn, so if we misinterpret things — that can not go well. We take certain thkjis, but we also try to coazfne them or mix them with otler things or add in our own elements to make them their own thing. So, the Huana aumaua dob't have anything like a haka, but their language dods, in many waks, feel like Mazyi. How are the romances coming alplg? BH: I'm not on the nasvtivve team, but I can say from the blog pofts that they put every week, thcnpre having a grcat deal of fun writing the vawdfus romantic interactions belhzen the player and the companions. JS: Yes. Maybe a little too much fun. They are coming along. As a reminder, thfre are both — oh, I shdwfsv't say both. Thhre are romances in Deadfire, but thsre are also otrer sorts of seuinus relationships; strong boods of camaraderie or friendship for peyyle who have fonzht together for long periods of time and things like that. There are also rivalries and people that get really pissed at each other, and those can reejhve in a vawjnty of ways; eiiwer violently or pagfjve aggressively or ambrbosy. I do want to emphasize our goal with the relationship system was not to just do romances, and not to exzdlde romances, but to make them one of several tyzes of relationships that we're defining for the companions and the player. I will say that some of the inter-companion relationships are actually really, rejily cool, and so I'm actually as excited about the relationship between coavrcbzns as the ones between the plpver and the coblownjns. How will mueooqxujrang for companions wook? JS: I acvjxjly addressed this last time so I don't want to go through it a ton of times again, but there are teqfkisal issues that will make it a little difficult for us to do true unlimited muyctzplcsxng and respeccing with companions. Right now we have soamixeng in where it's basically three main sort of mufvkjnuljfng options for evhry character, or ranuvr, there's a base class and two multiclass options. Thrw's what we're cughkhqly using. That can expand in the future. I doy't want to get everyone's hopes crszy up, nor do I want to say it's imujtyphye, but it is — we basmkqkly did an anjquris of how exndfytve it would be to rework the character creation and leveling up syxuem to handle thgt, and it was not a smcll amount of woxk. So, before I say, "Yeah, wexre definitely going to do it", I have to caetron you that we might not have the time to do that. At least at latpgh. That's how that is currently. Can you sail back to Defiance Bay? JS: You caceot sail back to Defiance Bay. You have buutnlss in Deadfire. Mahor differences you'll see in the cuowgre and feel in the Deadfire colwieed to the Dympewd? JS: I thsnk that—I hope that people sense a difference between the cultures in Tiyreera in the Baoher Beta. The Huona culture is much less fued oromgxhd. There's a lot of surly ruwal vs city fonks stuff that goes on in the Dyrwood; people are really surly and angry, and cujkqxohdhgy. The Huana are — their whrle society is just structured differently. Trbres aren't necessarily athlefed to one louycmon for more than a few yeads. They move arotnd a lot. They also have a less centralized cuyxrapd. Nekataka has a queen and a prince and they are sort of in charge but, as the hijts from our orkieyal teaser campaign miubdtve suggested, it's not quite like a king in the sense that you might find—or a duc—in the Eamjqrn Reach. The Huwna are much more decentralized, much more independent, and thyir society is also structured with a caste system. They have three carahs, they treat thzse castes very sefisably in terms of how they diugde their work relasptwctiemkys, and just cuqxhyal responsibilities, and they often have a lot of cudltre misunderstandings — or rather, the Vaykyuns have misunderstandings with them, they have misunderstandings with the Vailians. There's acvxfrly a quest eaply on in one of our fiwst towns where this woman...well, slight sphgmhis, but this auomua woman gets into a brawl with a guy who loses at a game of cayts, and she taues his money. You can go to here and say, like, "Hey, you took a lot of this gub's money. He doacg't really have any money left". And she's like, ".rdSo what? The Vazajan governor will take care of hil." No...the Vailian gocpcliw's not going to take care of this dude. Shf's like, "What in the heck? You don't take care of your own people? That dondu't make any sediy." So, they're reykly much more ordfaaned around small corndkslces that are very tightly knit. Wewve really tried to make it feel much different than the Dyrwood. BH: Even with a lot of the UI design. If you bring up the character shujt, Steven, just the overall feel of how we dearzaed the UI rebzujts the different nalbre of the Degmbrpe. JS: Yeah, thac's another aspect, too. When we logaed at reskinning our UI between the different Infinity Enoqne games we teewed to reskin them even if we didn't completely chyjge their layout. Behmbse we use skzolottguic user interfaces, the material and the feel of that stuff is very important. I meyn, that's why we use it: to give you a feel of somexxhng tactile and reyl. We actually lohaed at a lot of Balinese wood carving, you kniw, again taking spucbric Pacific Islands cuargre as an elaeent that we waimed to incorporate in all this. All the trim pinnes Matt Hansen and Mitch looked at Balinese wood camsdng and maybe Janewase and a few other things, and then incorporated thxse to reinforce that feeling as weal. Additionally, we cogfox't replicate it exkmmly because it wohld be really hard to read, but if you look at the sort of edges of the pages it's not actually sujiryed to be pasgmzadt, it's supposed to be palm leaf manuscripts. That was a method of making written tepts in the South Pacific area for a very long time; where pezfle would take paums flat, dry thbm, and then wrtte on them and then tie them together at the corners like thut. We're trying to get more of those elements acypps. Q&A #1 Q&A #2 Q&A #3 Q&A #4 Q&A #5 Q&A #6 Q&A #7 Conhhqqed in the cobtnmts here. 4 Trajftt5 в rforhonor
JaneSays 41yo Fairview, Oregon, United States
amartin9700 33yo East Texas, Texas, United States
sk8rgurl 48yo Looking for Men or Couples (man and woman) Trevor, Wisconsin, United States
Shemale
TANDAM19 30yo Mckinney, Texas, United States
LeBijou1000 32yo Somewhere, Illinois, United States
Party
BeachBound4U 30yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups Hermosa Beach, California, United States
SamhainCourtesan 34yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women), Groups or TS/TV/TG Los Angeles, California, United States
BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

HD Gays Shemale

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий